<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Mon, 21 May 2012 02:24:06 -0700 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network Comments Feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>By Cecilia</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ How do my platforms benefit from UEFI? Any specific features of the processor/chipset that can be utilized better with UEFI? ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-9375</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:04:19 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-9375</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Wolfgang Rosenberg (Intel)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ In general from processor/chipset point of view legacy bios and UEFI are at par, but development in UEFI environment can enable the features much faster.  Here is quick summary of UEFI advantages. More technical details are available at request if necessary. 
•       Specified standard for booting an operating system
     –  Active industry standard working group with compliance tests support 
•       Engineering agility in pre-operating system space
     –  Clean, architected interfaces 
     –  UEFI written in C and can be built with gmake and gcc
     –  Cross architecture, Extensible and Modular
•       Move beyond legacy BIOS
     –  New authenticated boot scenarios
     –  Support for new standard such as iPV6 (iPV6 network boot - iSCSI, PXE)
     –  Improve boot graphics (Safe Mode Video - GOP in UEFI)
     –  Faster network boot performance
•       Eliminate legacy restrictions for UEFI aware OS’s.  
     –  Shortage of option ROM space
     –  32-bit protected mode as being a native mode of operation
     –  64-bit native code for x64 and Itanium
     –  Support for > 2TB hard disk
•       UEFI establishes a foundation on which many innovative features can be delivered, i.e. Capsule  update / remote config which can help to reduce TCO by reducing upgrade downtime and making platforms easier to manage (generic flash update routine for all flash including add-in cards)
(Shell application is not built into the flash. Whoever needs the Shell, should download it from Tianocore.org and put it on a USB flash device that is FAT formatted or on a CDROM)

Regards WR
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-15923</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:40:09 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-15923</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Ravi</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Hello WR,

Could you please let me know UEFI 2.1 supports IPV6 stack.

Thanks
Ravi ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-21248</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:02:11 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-21248</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By vid512</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ UEFI 2.1 standard doesn't seem to fully support IPv6 yet (latest UEFI 2.2oct6 however supports it). You can download the standard after filling form at http://www.uefi.org/specs/

But note that the standard as far as I know doesn't *demand* implementation of IPv6 protocol (like with almost every other protocol, UEFI standard demands only very little). So, even if your board/BIOS was UEFI 2.2 compliant, that doesn't mean it would nescessarily support IPv6. ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-21444</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:33:28 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-21444</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By dsigma</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Unified Extensible Firmware Interface，but I want more info about software ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-40062</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:22:27 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-40062</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By deepaganesh</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Does EDK2 support floating point arithmatic? If so do I need to enable any compiler flag?
I get the following error during compilation if I use floating point values.
error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _fltused
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-52629</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 04:59:06 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-52629</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By  ayuda entre 2 modelos a elegir placa P67 - Foros de CHW</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ n/a ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-58536</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:56:22 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-58536</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By archana</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ hi
can you please give me some idea about programing in UEFI to develope an application ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-64784</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:26:37 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/about-uefi/#comment-64784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>
