<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:15:06 -0800 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network Comments feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/feed/</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>By charlie</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ 
Myth #4: Intel Graphics Drivers are Highly Problematic

&quot;It is a fact that there have been problems with Intel graphics drivers in the past. &quot;

Then its not a myth, fixing the older drivers might help appearances too.

&quot;including ISVs and gamers, to help ensure that any bugs encountered are reported to the driver team at Intel. To do this, follow these steps:&quot;

Except you don't actually give gamers any steps on how to report bugs, just partners and developers.
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-44</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:45:25 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-44</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By David Jurado</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ 
Some of the myths that are being &quot;demystified&quot; here are completely true in the 945 architecture. So them should not be presented as misconcepts; they are new features of the last family of chips.

For example: 
* &quot;Myth #3: Intel Graphics is too slow while performing Transform and Lighting&quot; .- It is not a myth. 945 GPUs had no HW vertex shaders, so them must be computed in the CPU/s, being a slow operation.
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-48</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:02:23 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-48</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By David Jurado</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ 
Continued...

* &quot;Myth #4: Intel Graphics Drivers are Highly Problematic&quot; .- It is completely true, at least the Linux drivers for 945 are highly incomplete: No FBO support, no DXTC, no GLSL, no PBO, and some bugs with functions as glAttribPointer, and compression reporting. In fact Windows drivers are more up to date.

* &quot;Myth #2: Intel Has a Small Segment of the Graphics Market&quot; .- That is because it is being counted the cheap integrated GPUs. No one doubt that Intel is the first here, in the low-end integrated chips segment.
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-49</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:02:51 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-49</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Yuhong Bao</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ 
Pay attension, Intel is talking about the 965, not the 945.
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-52</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:23:04 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-52</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Simon</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ 
the most important thing is that all highly regarded mainstream games work... like BF2, HL2, Doom3, UT, WoW, AoE3 and so on... i think ppl can live without being able to play 100% of the games that gets released as long as all the big ones gets some kind of support.

its exciting watching every new release of the drivers, seeing how new features emerges or unlocks, while old features still get performance improvements. i must say i was shocked to see how well x3100 performs in BF2... examples of that can be seen on youtube (making a search for: BF2 x3100)...

big thanks goes to the intel graphics team for not forgetting about supporting old products and since the x4500 igp have so much resemblence to the x3x00 series its likely that many features will keep getting optimized or added to the x3x00 series :-)
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-65</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:40:16 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-65</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Thiago</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ 
Is it possible to tune the application and get a decent performance from X3000 from OpenGL, either on Windows or not?
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-66</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:54:47 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-66</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Intel(R) Software Network Support</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ 
Thiago, we'd like to encourage you to join the discussions on the Graphics forum at www.intel.com/software/forums.  There, you can work through your specific tuning issues together with Intel experts and other community members.
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-67</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:23:50 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-67</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By NS Sherlock</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ 
Myths 1 and 2...

I call major BS!
You cant even load Crysis on Insmell grafix.

Discrete vs intergrated, now compare how many gaming PCs use intergrated and discrete.

Don't BS the consumer or else Maximum PC readers will come in force to lay the smacketh down with a rotting trout.
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-100</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 12:48:33 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-100</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Chicri</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ 
Myth 1: yeah you can run games for real? i tried it and have you integrated graphics. I tell you i bought an nvidia card. Im not buying you BS marketing on your graphics again.

Myth 2: yeah you have the integrated graphics cause you dont have an opponent in that segment. now you amd/ati has the 780G and nvidia has 8200, I remember nvidia calling your next gfx Laughabee also GL on your DX 10.x drivers LOL i tried crysis on intel 3500 I LOLED.

Myth 3: Youre lying go watch you tube 780G owns G35. Second G35 uses the cpu more hahaha fails

Myth 4: True go fix it GL
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-119</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 18:01:52 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-119</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Andy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ What are the lastest driver for X3100?winvista_15113?I and friends can&#39;t play NBA2K9 with Inspiron 1420 ,Intel 965 Chipset.
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-8827</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:55:46 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-8827</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By McNinjaguy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ What are you running FEAR and WoW for their in game settings?

640 x 480 and all lowest possible graphics?
WoW recently got a big update and a 7600Gt now has problems running that game.

Your marketing machine is trying to rip off people, especially for buying a laptop.

 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-25014</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 02:55:40 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/common-misconceptions-of-intel-integrated-graphics/#comment-25014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>