http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic en-us http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21117 Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:19:54 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21117 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21119 Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:22:44 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21119 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21121 Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:29:52 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21121 construct provided by TBB - (or with something similiar). And I beleive the new constructs that are being worked into the upcoming C/C++ specs to support atomics will also be good. ]]> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21160 Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:27:52 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21160 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21170 Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:01:02 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21170 construct provided by TBB - (or with something similiar). And I beleive the new constructs that are being worked into the upcoming C/C++ specs to support atomics will also be good. But std::atomic<>::load() will emit NON LOCKed load of the data, so Inspector will report a race, right? ]]> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21172 Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:09:24 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21172 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21181 Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:08:59 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-race-identified-on-atomic-construct-win32-interlocked-functions-pragma-omp-atomic-or-atomic/#comment-21181