<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Wed, 23 May 2012 10:59:56 -0700 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/deprecated-ipp-api-in-version-60/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network Comments Feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/deprecated-ipp-api-in-version-60</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>By Ferdinand Stefanus</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Hi,

I have noticed that when calling the function ippResize or ippResizeCenter recursively and sequentially with small delay (< 100 ms) in between, uses less CPU usage as compared to ippResizeSqrPixel. The comparison is based on resizing 1280x1024 image to 877x602 image. I have tried using the single algorithm or parallel algorithm introduced in the documentation but it still uses alot of CPU usage in both algorithms. I cannot figure out what's wrong with ippResizeSqrPixel function. 

Does anyone faced the same problem? ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/deprecated-ipp-api-in-version-60/#comment-27547</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:53:18 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/deprecated-ipp-api-in-version-60/#comment-27547</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Ying S (Intel)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Have you tried the latest version 6.1? If not , please go to http://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-ipp to get the latest update. If you still experience the problem, it is recommended to submit this issue into Intel IPP forum at http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-integrated-performance-primitives/ ? or Private Premier at https://premier.intel.com .

In issue submission, please provide your image files with different sizes, target test platform with configuration, so we can take a look to see if we can reproduce the problem.
Thanks,
Ying ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/deprecated-ipp-api-in-version-60/#comment-31214</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:29:24 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/deprecated-ipp-api-in-version-60/#comment-31214</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By mdl61</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ We have noticed a similar problem and traced it to the internal threading mechanism.  We have implemented our own threading external to ippResizeSqrPixel and this conflicts with the internal threading causing an increase of 40% CPU utilization, mostly in the kernel.  We avoid this problem by calling ippSetNumThreads(1) before using ippResizeSqrPixel. ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/deprecated-ipp-api-in-version-60/#comment-38512</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:28:08 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/deprecated-ipp-api-in-version-60/#comment-38512</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Ying H (Intel)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Regarding the cpu usage issue, some discussion in http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/high-cpu-usage-and-intel-ipp-threaded-function/ may helpful

 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/deprecated-ipp-api-in-version-60/#comment-50543</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:34:56 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/deprecated-ipp-api-in-version-60/#comment-50543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>
