http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling en-us text data bss dec filename 30256 768 406 31430 task.o 3039 68 32 3139 tbb_misc.o 1196 4 0 1200 rml_tbb.o 34491 840 438 35769 Stripped of support for the Intel Parallel Inspector and Detector, it comes to <32k. Compiling with icc and tool support brings it up to 59K. I don't know whether the bloat buys significant performance or not. Much of the complexity of the TBB task scheduler comes from advanced features like exception safety and affinity support. Of course there's much more in TBB than just a task scheduler, which is why the library is larger than 35K. Not that we can't make it smaller. Jerome's note motivated me to inventory the size of the .o files in TBB, and I found an easy 9K to eliminate from concurrent_vector.o by moving some inlined cold-path code out of line. An occasional bloat audit can do wonders. ]]> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-34293 Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:53:11 -0800 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-34293 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-34366 Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:01:53 -0800 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-34366 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-45730 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:21:25 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-45730 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-45739 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:40:35 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-45739 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-45927 Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:03:44 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-45927 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-47346 Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:16:59 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-47346 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-47356 Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:15:41 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-47356 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-47680 Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:22:27 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-47680 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-47962 Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:27:43 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-47962 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-48619 Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:13:24 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-48619 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-53264 Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:28:34 -0800 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-53264 isBusy) doWork() loop). Suppose there is a task T2, which is next in the queue and it has to wait for T1 to complete, so it asks worker M to wait, but since T1 is already waiting on J1 and doWork has been re-entered from T2 it will result in a Deadlock since the control cannot return to T1's waiting loop until T2 is done. But T2 cant be done without T1. How is this resolved? ]]> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-58830 Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:38:56 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-58830 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-70025 Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:22:43 -0800 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-70025 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-70942 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:41:41 -0800 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-70942 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-70943 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:42:31 -0800 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-70943 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-70944 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:45:48 -0800 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-70944 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-70945 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:58:02 -0800 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-70945 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-72151 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:07:41 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-72151 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-72170 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:11:35 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-72170 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-72172 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:19:22 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-72172 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-72175 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:59:23 -0700 http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/do-it-yourself-game-task-scheduling/#comment-72175