<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Wed, 23 May 2012 09:49:18 -0700 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/endianness-whitepaper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network Comments Feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/endianness-whitepaper</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>By Maximillian Domeika (Intel)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Great article.  I refer to this quite frequently.   Max ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/endianness-whitepaper/#comment-28513</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:37:57 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/endianness-whitepaper/#comment-28513</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By jaynarayan</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Big endian and little endian i have been reading from my childhood engineering carrer. In my engineering career only I presumed that there would not be any new problem in this endian area. But after reading your article the myth has dissapeared from within. Please privides some more work in this area. 

 Thank you.
  Jaynarayan ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/endianness-whitepaper/#comment-30688</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:00:48 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/endianness-whitepaper/#comment-30688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>
