<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:45:47 -0800 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network Comments feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/feed/</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>By vrk</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ This is such an old article and I don&#39;t think it is relavant to the 2.6 kernel. I don&#39;t blame intel/authors for that, but you shoulc clearly show a &#34;created&#34; date so that you don&#39;t mislead people with false understanding.

With a single intel pro 1000 interface, xeon 2.8 GHz Quad Core, there is no way this article helps to acheive any more than 100K packets per second. That&#39;s a mere 51 Mbps at 64 byte packet size?? Pathetic throughput in my opinion.

If anyone has any suggestions, please reply. ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/#comment-8314</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:56:57 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/#comment-8314</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Javier</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Please read the article a little slower. They are using 1 NIC per CPU and thus can evenly spread the NIC interrupt load across CPUs. With one single NIC all interrupts go to one CPU so you miss most of the gains.
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/#comment-9609</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:27:19 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/#comment-9609</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Pascal Charest &amp;#8211; blog d&amp;#8217;un consultant en logiciel libre &amp;raquo; Blog Archive  &amp;raquo; processor/CPU affinity on GNU/linux</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ n/a ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/#comment-26293</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:38:20 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/#comment-26293</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By   Useful kernel and driver performance tweaks for your Linux server at time to bleed by Joe Damato</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ n/a ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/#comment-28629</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:20:50 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/#comment-28629</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By   Useful kernel and driver performance tweaks for your Linux server at time to bleed by Joe Damato</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ n/a ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/#comment-28650</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:46:15 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/improved-linux-smp-scaling-user-directed-processor-affinity/#comment-28650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>