<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Fri, 25 May 2012 16:12:00 -0700 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-hardware-accelerated-high-definition-video-playback-power-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network Comments Feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-hardware-accelerated-high-definition-video-playback-power-analysis</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>By Huang Jin</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ There are some issues with this test.
1. The decoding include Video and Audio, and different Audio cost different level of CPU.
And since Video decoding are all VLD, AACS and Audio part cost most of the CPU in BD.
So only use Video Codec is not approicate.
Should also mention which audio format it use, like DTS MA, Dolby, LPCM, etc.

2. Different BD has different bit-rate, it's not comparable only if the average bit-rate are almost the same. ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-hardware-accelerated-high-definition-video-playback-power-analysis/#comment-32668</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:42:52 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-hardware-accelerated-high-definition-video-playback-power-analysis/#comment-32668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>
