<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Fri, 25 May 2012 11:10:45 -0700 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/low-power-on-intel-architecture-research-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network Comments Feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/low-power-on-intel-architecture-research-project</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>By sirebral</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ So Um..  I have this undying question that just needs to be asked.  What the Heck man??  Why didn't Intel pick up the XFCE platform for their LPIA studies?  I am looking at Netbook Remix for my DELL Mini 9 and I am thinking, OMGZ!!  Xubuntu is only 1.5 GB.  1 point 5 man.  One  p o i n t  Five.

So maybe in the future you can either pick up the XFCE platform for the smaller footprint (XFCE works on Unix Based OS's so Mac is covered if you NEED THAT!!), or you can explain why you are basically "Reinventing the Wheel." ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/low-power-on-intel-architecture-research-project/#comment-12643</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:11:47 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/low-power-on-intel-architecture-research-project/#comment-12643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>
