<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Fri, 25 May 2012 11:49:03 -0700 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/measure-code-sections-using-the-enhanced-timer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network Comments Feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/measure-code-sections-using-the-enhanced-timer</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>By Mnunes</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Can I use this in linux? ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/measure-code-sections-using-the-enhanced-timer/#comment-8734</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:08:33 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/measure-code-sections-using-the-enhanced-timer/#comment-8734</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Niresh</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ "This is to ensure that the initial and final times are taken on the same processor. " - Does it mean that SetThreadAffinityMask is being used to make sure the measuremants are taken from the same core and hence incurring additional performance overhead of this system call? ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/measure-code-sections-using-the-enhanced-timer/#comment-47056</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 07:19:38 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/measure-code-sections-using-the-enhanced-timer/#comment-47056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>
