<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Fri, 25 May 2012 12:59:45 -0700 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/more-work-sharing-with-openmp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network Comments Feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/more-work-sharing-with-openmp</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>By Benson Margulies</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ The first part of this article gives the strong impression that the only effect of a plain

#pragma omp parallel

is to allocate some threads for eventual use. 

Only later, under the section about master and single does it explain that this pragma in fact unleashes parallel execution. I was fooled. It would be better, in my opinion, if the example given up there, or the prose, was to clarify this and point down to the later section.
 ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/more-work-sharing-with-openmp/#comment-7910</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:50:03 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/more-work-sharing-with-openmp/#comment-7910</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Todd Bezenek</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ The OpenMP support in Intel's Threading Profiler is very good.  If you have not looked at it, please do.

-Todd ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/more-work-sharing-with-openmp/#comment-51740</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 00:23:49 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/more-work-sharing-with-openmp/#comment-51740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>
