<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Fri, 25 May 2012 12:23:39 -0700 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network Comments Feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>By Antakis, Spyridon </title>
      <description><![CDATA[ I am working at an Intel's project that targets to integrate IPPs into the latest version of OpenSSL (1.0.0a) stack. Do you have any additional ipp-samples for OpenSSL-1.0.0a ? Are you aware if the patches for the previous versions could be used into the latest version OR should I try to patch the stack from scratch?

Thank you in advance! ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems/#comment-50067</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:02:17 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems/#comment-50067</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Paul Fischer (Intel)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Hello Spyridon,

I'm not aware of any comparison by the IPP team that has checked to see how much the 0.98j sources have changed relative to the 1.0 sources. The modifications don't impact a large number of files, so the changes can probably be migrated over, at least by hand.

Regards,

Paul ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems/#comment-50120</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:29:14 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems/#comment-50120</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Antakis, Spyridon </title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Hello Paul,

Indeed, by applying the -0.9.8 patch into the 1.0 source code and with some tiny modifications, it seems to work. Thanks again!

Regards,
Spyros  ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems/#comment-50158</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:13:48 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems/#comment-50158</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Antakis, Spyridon </title>
      <description><![CDATA[ You might want to check the following recent article: http://zombe.es/post/5183420528/accelerated-ssl

Cheers, 
Spyros ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems/#comment-60901</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:49:15 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems/#comment-60901</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By Paul Fischer (Intel)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Hello Spyros,

Thanks for the pointer! Will forward to my colleagues.

Paul ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems/#comment-60912</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:27:18 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/performance-of-crypto-sample-for-openssl-slowing-down-on-hyper-threading-systems/#comment-60912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>
