Forum Jump

Select Group :
Select Forum :
Sorted By :
Sort Order :
From The :
 
Thread Tools  Search this thread 
wotte@dre.vanderbilt.edu
Total Points:
10
Registered User
June 16, 2009 2:14 PM PDT
idbc: Assertion failed: "loadableSection() == rhs.loadableSection()" src/st/mem/pil_unrelocatedaddr.C:130
Hi -

I am trying to debug a core dump in my application, and I'm having trouble loading the resulting core file.  While starting up idbc, I recieve the following warning:

Warning: Unable to locate Debug Information Entry.
Further instances ignored.

Then, when I attempt to get a stack trace, only the first two levels are printed, and the following error occurs:

Assertion failed: "loadableSection() == rhs.loadableSection()" src/st/mem/pil_unrelocatedaddr.C:130
This is an unexpected condition and may indicate the presence of a defect.
If you wish to report this, please include the stack trace that follows.
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN15IDBAssertFailed3runEPKcS1_j+0xe) [0x5d42e4]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN14DTLU_namespace12assertFailedEPKcS1_j+0x24) [0xb83d64]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZNK15UnrelocatedAddrleERKS_+0x28) [0xb29380]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN15ParseSymsDwarf218unwindRule_via_fdeER15UnrelocatedAddrRP14UnwindRulePSD2mRKS0_PKcmb+0x166b) [0xad6365]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN15ParseSymsDwarf219unwindRuleViaDwarf2ERK15UnrelocatedAddr+0x277) [0xad48cd]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN20Registers_for_Unwind6unwindEP15ParseSymsDwarf2+0x89) [0x6fd949]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN15ParseSymsDwarf26unwindER14IUnwindSupport+0x17) [0xad6a3b]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_Z15unwindViaDwarf2P12LoadableFileR14IUnwindSupport+0x63) [0xad6a1d]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_Z20EM64T_virtual_unwindP7ProcessP10FrameEM64TP24RegisterSetContentsEM64T+0xbd) [0x6f1097]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN10FrameEM64T30ensureUnwoundRegsetContentsWkrEv+0x1eb) [0x6f0dcb]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN7FrameHW27ensureUnwoundRegsetContentsEv+0xa4) [0x6ef6d2]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN10FrameEM64T9callerWkrEv+0x27) [0x6f1155]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN7FrameHW12earlierFrameEv+0x13c) [0x6ed3e8]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN5Frame20earlierLangFuncFrameEbPb+0x52) [0x6ebc1a]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_Z29earlierDisplayedLangFuncFrameP5FramebPb+0x7e) [0x870276]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb [0x8745df]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN12CmdBacktrace5do_itER19CmdExecutionContextRN10BaseForCmd9CmdResultE+0x1cb) [0x873ea5]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_ZN10BaseForCmd7executeEb+0xcce) [0x81a232]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(vfprintf+0x3f5c) [0x5d006c]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_Z15ProcessCommandsv+0x47) [0x5cf851]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(_Z7idbMainiPPKcS1_+0x1b0) [0x5cf2d8]
/project/sinistradtmp/wotte/intel/bin/intel64/iidb(main+0x3c) [0x5ce080]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x7fdb67e951c4]


Any idea how to resolve this?
Jennifer Jiang (Intel)
Total Points:
19,627
Status Points:
19,127
Brown Belt
June 17, 2009 9:30 AM PDT
Rate
 
#1
This issue has been reported before, but we're still investigating. When there's any news, we will let you know.
Sorry about the inconvenience.

Jennifer
Hubert Haberstock (Intel)
Total Points:
1,130
Status Points:
630
Brown Belt
June 18, 2009 8:21 AM PDT
Rate
 
#2 Reply to #1

The problem you reported is most likely fixed in the upcoming 11.1 compiler release that will be available by end of June 09. Will you have a chance to verify the fix with 11.1 by then?
Regards,
Hubert.


Intel Software Network Forums Statistics

8286 users have contributed to 31231 threads and 99107 posts to date.
In the past 24 hours, we have 7 new thread(s) 31 new posts(s), and 43 new user(s).

In the past 3 days, the most popular thread for everyone has been comparison cilk++, openmp, pthreads first results The most posts were made to comparison cilk++, openmp, pthreads first results The post with the most views is Very amusing...  Escalated as

Please welcome our newest member titanius.anglesmith