<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:25:22 -0800 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/threading-on-intel-parallel-architectures/topic/69670/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network - <![CDATA[ To learn parallel programing with FFTs using intel MKL ]]> feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/threading-on-intel-parallel-architectures/topic/69670</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: To learn parallel programing with FFTs using intel MKL</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ <div style="margin:0px;"></div>
Such questions, if not covered in the MKL docs, would usually be asked on the MKL forum, at least if they pertain to parallelism within an FFT.  Of course, if you have multiple independent FFT analyses of similar size, it may be more effective to make parallel tasks or loops outside the MKL calls, which makes the parallelism more generic.  Then there is nothing specific to FFT, except that you may choose to invoke mkl_sequential.<br /> ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/threading-on-intel-parallel-architectures/topic/69670/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:48:04 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/threading-on-intel-parallel-architectures/topic/69670/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: To learn parallel programing with FFTs using intel MKL</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ <div style="margin:0px;">Hi Tim!<br /><br />I forget to mention that I'm working with fortran 90 on Linux, OpenSuse 11.1. I´ve checked the MKL docs, but the examples are oriented to C++. You know where can to find examples in fortran?<br /><br />effectively I have multiple independent FFT analyses, but I would like to reduce the process time because in the last computation  the time was increased considereable...<br /><br />thanks<br /><br />Angel<br /><br /><br />
<div id="quote_reply" style="margin-top: 5px; width: 100%;">
<div style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;">Quoting - <a href="/en-us/profile/367365">tim18</a></div>
<div style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"><em>Such questions, if not covered in the MKL docs, would usually be asked on the MKL forum, at least if they pertain to parallelism within an FFT.  Of course, if you have multiple independent FFT analyses of similar size, it may be more effective to make parallel tasks or loops outside the MKL calls, which makes the parallelism more generic.  Then there is nothing specific to FFT, except that you may choose to invoke mkl_sequential.<br /></em></div>
</div>
</div>
<br /> ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/threading-on-intel-parallel-architectures/topic/69670/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:46:33 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/threading-on-intel-parallel-architectures/topic/69670/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>