PCSDK\include\pxcbase.h(28): in 'PXCBase::operator delete(void*)' pure virtual Release() method is called after object destruction.
c++ bug: PXCBase::operator delete: destroyed object method call
Thu, 11/08/2012 - 04:08
c++ bug: PXCBase::operator delete: destroyed object method call
For more complete information about compiler optimizations, see our Optimization Notice.
- Log in to post comments
Thu, 11/08/2012 - 07:45
We will investigate and it will be fixed in future release. Thanks! David
- Log in to post comments
Mon, 11/12/2012 - 17:58
Could you submit a test case to reproduce this bug?
- Log in to post comments
Mon, 11/26/2012 - 05:26
ISO/IEC IS 14882 Programming languages - C++
12.4 Destructors [class.dtor]
Claim 14
Once a destructor is invoked for an object, the object no longer exists; the behavior is undefined if the destructor is invoked for an object whose lifetime has ended (3.8).
- Log in to post comments
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 14:02
Are you trying to implement a PXCBase class derived interface, say PXCGesture?
If so, you should implement it as
class MyGestureImpl: public PXCBaseImpl {
};
You can see that the PXCBaseImpl implements the desctructor.
There should not be cases as you described.
That's why I am asking for a test case.
- Log in to post comments
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 14:01
Are you trying to implement a PXCBase class derived interface, say PXCGesture?
If so, you should implement it as
class MyGestureImpl: public PXCBaseImpl {
};
You can see that the PXCBaseImpl implements the desctructor.
There should not be cases as you described.
That's why I am asking for a test case.
- Log in to post comments
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 14:05
It should be class MyGestureImpl: public PXCBaseImpl %lt PXCGesture %gt {
}
- Log in to post comments
Tue, 11/27/2012 - 14:05
It should be class MyGestureImpl: public PXCBaseImpl %lt PXCGesture %gt {
}