<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Generated on Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:50:07 -0800 -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Intel Software Network - <![CDATA[ WhatIf Alpha Software ]]> feed</title>
    <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>comparison cilk++, openmp, pthreads first results</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Hello, <br /><br />Here the first results of my comparison of cilk++ and openmp, on my application which is 3D meshgeneration. I have done here the first part which is octree-refinement + inserting triangles. The reference is a pthreaded version of the code.<br />Please consider, that these are first numbers. The difference between cilk++ and openmp is also due to the used compiler-version (but cilk is done only for the 4.2.4). <br /><br />best regards<br /><br />Ferdinand ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69681/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:10:30 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69681/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
      <category>ISN General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PTU Error with OpenGL apps and new NVIDIA drivers</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Running on a Redhat 5 64-bit linux system with NVIDIA Quadro gfx, using NVIDIA 185.18.14 or newer drivers, ptu profiling (vtssrun) on any OpenGL app gives the error:<br /><br /><br />2714602318157736 : 2a95f18680 : CRITICAL : 'dlsym' for '_Exit' error Bad file descriptoropen log '(null)': Bad address<br />write log: Bad file descriptor<br />2714602318197872 : 2a95f18680 : CRITICAL : 'dlsym' for '_exit' faild. Error Bad file descriptoropen log '(null)': Bad address<br />write log: Bad file descriptor<br /><br />over and over again.<br /><br />If I roll back to 173.14.12, the profiling works as expected<br /> ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69659/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:51:15 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69659/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
      <category>ISN General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PTU Error with OpenGL apps and new NVIDIA drivers</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Running on Redhat 5 64-bit linux machines (tried on several different ones) with NVIDIA driver 185.18.14 or later, if I try to profile (vtssrun) any OpenGL app using ptu 3.2, I receive the following errors:<br /><br />2714602317306492 : 2a95f18680 : CRITICAL : 'dlsym' for '_Exit' error Bad file descriptoropen log '(null)': Bad address<br />write log: Bad file descriptor<br />2714602317342532 : 2a95f18680 : CRITICAL : 'dlsym' for '_exit' faild. Error Bad file descriptoropen log '(null)': Bad address<br />write log: Bad file descriptor<br /><br />If I roll back to 173.x.x drivers (specifically 173.14.12) the profiling works as expected ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69657/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:40:40 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69657/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
      <category>ISN General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>User undo action in TM</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ STM ABI says that function registered by calling _ITM_addUserUndoAction() is executed if a transaction is aborted or retried to allow the user code to undo any operations.
<div>Is it possible to get pointer to _ITM_abortReason struct or to detect if transaction was aborted by user or retried inside this user-defined function?</div> ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69641/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:42:38 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69641/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
      <category>ISN General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>cilk++ does not support 64bit programming ?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ I find my cilk++ code can not be compiler wtih vs 2008 and intel c++ if I choose win64 platform. ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69621/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:10:58 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69621/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
      <category>ISN General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openmp vs cilk++</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ <p>which one is better ? <br />easy to use, performance ?</p> ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69595/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:18:49 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69595/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
      <category>ISN General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Problems with cilk++</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Hello, <br /><br />I was downloading and testing the clik++ compiler. I am very exited about this, since the first results are showing good performance and a nice coding style too. Now I was moving further, porting my standard application to cilk++. At the beginning this is an octree, where I insert (a lot of) triangles. It took me a long time to find out, but now I ended up with a state, where running the code with g++ gives the correct results. Running the code with cilk++ (only changing the compiler, no cilk_for, or any other parallel stuff used) gives wrong results. If I switch off the optimization in cilk++ it again works (even with the parallel loops). The problem is, if I cannot use the optimization, this is very slow and it makes no sense to use it. <br /><br />Are there some known compiler problems? How can I proceed, I would still love to do the cilk-typed coding, since this would simplyfy a lot.<br /><br /><br />best regards<br /><br />Ferdinand ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69587/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:29:24 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69587/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
      <category>ISN General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel STM Compiler barrier optimizations</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Hi -<br /><br />The TM Compiler and Runtime ABI specification 1.0.1 states that the compiler could generate code without some barriers. In such a case, the compiler places speficic requirements on the runtime. (e.g. code without "after write" barriers requires an in-place update STM).<br /><br />My understanding is that the Intel STM Compiler v3.0 implements this ABI specification but I am wondering whether it also makes the above relaxations (omitting barriers). <br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />-Haris ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69295/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:55:41 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69295/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
      <category>ISN General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel Adaptive Spike-Based Solver</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Hello,
<div><span style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I have a question about Intel Spike solver. I want to solve matrix ecology2 (http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/matrices/McRae/ecology2.html) from florida matrix collection using SPIKE. What kind of solving strategy (RSS, DFS, OIS) should I choose? The matrix is solved on a 48-nodes cluster with 8 cores on each node.</span></div> ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69221/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:51:49 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69221/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
      <category>ISN General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel STM C/C++ Contention Manager</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ Hi all,<br /><br />Does anyone know whether or not it is possible to override the Intel compiler's transaction contention manager with a custom implementation? I am basically looking to modify the behaviour in which Intel STM aborts one transaction over another.<br /><br />Any help would be greatly appreciated. ]]></description>
      <link>http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69060/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:04:37 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/whatif-alpha-software/topic/69060/</guid>
      <category>Parallel Programming</category>
      <category>ISN General</category>
    </item>
  </channel></rss>