Hello,
Does icc actually performs alias optimizations with "restrict" keyword?
Thanks.
Intel® C++ Compiler
RH9 and static linkage with icc 7.1
I am trying to statically link a program on a RH9 system with the 7.1 icc compiler. From this forum I found out that I need to copy an older version of glibc somewhere. I did as suggested and got glibc-2.2.93-5 from RH8 and installed
/opt/intel/old_libs/lib/libc-2.2.93.so
/opt/intel/old_libs/lib/libpthread.so
and changed
/opt/intel/compiler70/ia32/bin/icc.cfg
to include the libraries. I can compile programs now and they run fine. In order to statically link my program I also installed
/usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `__multi3'
I installed itenium icc (7.0) on linux
(2.4.18-e.25smp, ia64)
I have a linking problem when I use openGL library.
For extreme case, I try to complie and link "hello world" code.
When I compile very simple "hello world" code with ecc (itenium
intel compiler) and gcc, both of them work fine.
But, when I complie the code with ecc with -lGL link option,
it produce "/usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `__multi3'" linking error.
Of course, compilation and linking with gcc with -lGL option works find.
Any idea?
is it really impossible to get the temporary patch for kernel?
In the pdf "Compatibility with GNU Compilers", there is a long statement about that icc 7.1 can handle 2.4.18 kernel w/ some internal-use patchs. The ways to modify the kernel code also showed. however is there any ready-to-use patches can be downloaded?
Though not too lazy, I feel not confident & skillful enough to modify the whole kernel code by hand. ( plz don't blame me.)
I searched the forum and got two threads about the same topic. neither had a patch in reply. I wonder if some warmhearted host can help to give the icc patch. appreciate
Red Hat Linux 7.1 support
Hi team,
I've downloaded the linux compilers 7.1 and its docs say I need one of two glibc versions, either 2.2.5 or 2.2.93. On my default Red Hat 7.1 distribution, the default glibc is 2.2.2.
Is upgrading my glib the only option here? Seems to me that a default distribution should be part of the deal, yes?
cheers
jdg
Default parameters in the template function
Hello,
I have a template function defined as:
void SetStrings (const CString* pPrefix, const CString* pSeparator = NULL, const CString* pSuffix = NULL);
But compiler complains about the following code:
Z:EDevReusablesCommonDisplayNMLabeledPipe.cpp(279): error #165: too few arguments in function call
LabelInfo.eTimeSlot.SetStrings (&eTimeSlotFieldName, &eRangeDash);
It looks like, for some reason, it's missing that the last two arguments are the default ones.
Please advice what I am missing here.
POLL: Windows COM Attributes/Managed C++/C#
Hello,
A couple of *seconds* of your time will be of great value to us.
Question:What do you want most in the Intel Windows compiler?
Global asm variables
Hi,
I have the following piece of code:
When compiling with GCC, this gives me the expected resulting output:
However, with ICC (7.0), i get:
C compiler cannot create executables
sorry for giving such stupid questions.
I installed 7.1 w/o any errors. the license file was also copied.
however when i run the icc alone like
$ icc
/usr/lib/crt1.o: In function `_start':
/usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `main'
configure the default compiler as:
export LD=xild
export AR=xiar
export CC=icc
export CXX=icc
and try some linux code to compile, in the "./configure" stage, got:
icc creates MUCH larger binaries compared to g++
Hello everybody,
While trying out icc on a c++ project the resulting binaries/
libraries are almost 2-3 times the size of those created using
g++. No such problems with C only.
A check on other c++ libraries such as Qt gives similiar results.
e.g. libqt-mt 3.1.1 with g++ is ~ 6M; with icc ~ 15M.
The binaries also consume upto 1.5 times the RAM; making icc
unusable for large projects.
nm -D
| awk '{ print $(NF-1) " " $NF }' | sort -u | wc -l
shows that the number of symbols is also 2-3 times (almost
