Hi Forum people,
this is an IA32 architecture question for performance, but I am not sure which would be a suitable forum for it, so I post is here.
It's about the balance of spatial locality of loads versus writes: I have a dilemma in my algorithm implementation: I could improve storage spatial locality at the expense of sacrifying loads spatial locality, but I don't know *how much* or any quantitative criteria, in the form of byte quantities.
I think that indeed spatial locality in storages is more important -in terms of performance- than spatial locality in loads, in order to decrease WCB partial evictions. However, I don't know where the limit is.
For example, an extreme would be ~100% of consecutive stores, but very 'spotted' (~0% consecutive) loads.
Do you know where/how I can determine such balance?
As input parameters of this criteria, I know:
- the number and size of the WCBs (from the pentium model; let's say Nwd)
- the cache parameters (L1 and L2 sizes, cache line size, etc.)
I would expect something like
optimum ratio: [load transaction size] VERSUS [storage transaction size]
spatial locality: writes versus loads (IA32 Architecture question)
Lun, 25/10/2004 - 22:33