- The Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual Volume 2A and 2B (available here) are the instruction set reference.
- Haswell (2013) new instructionsare in theprogrammer's reference manual.
- In appendix C of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Optimization Reference Manual (available here), the latencies and throughput of instructions are listed.
Have you ever tried to find all CPUID Signature Values of DisplayFamily_DisplayModel in Intel Manuals?
It takes some time to find a table with all these codes and I'd like to make a Feature Request:
Please add a new Appendix in all Intel Manuals with CPUID Signature Values of DisplayFamily_DisplayModel. It would be nice to see codes for all Intel CPUs.
Thanks in advance.
I'd like to hear from Intel engineers that Latency of a General purpose MOV instruction on any Intel CPUs is 1 clock cycle. For example, I've completed a set of tests for Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.60GHz and my numbers are as follows:
[ Intel C++ compiler - DEBUG ]
Overhead of Assignment: 1.091 clock cycles
Hi Intel Experts:
Are there real-time OS supporting latest Intel CPU, such as Ivy-bridge?
If so, does Intel provide any parallel tools for the real-time OS?
I have some code where at some point, after doing SSE3 computations with __m128d-typed values, I need to:
a) store a __m128d value into one of the two halves of a __m256d value (not cast it!)
b) paste two __m128d values side-by-side into a __m256d value
Are there any AVX intrinsics to perform these operations?
Thanks in advance,
I have a question about shufps instructions. So what kind of C code would usually generate shufps by the compiler?
Thank you for your help!
I am a grad student in EE. I am looking for 8088/8086 core for my project. Project is to design a bus monitor which can interface with either 8088/8086. I searched on opencore.org but could not find. I am looking for one which has all pins exposed - ALE, RD, WR, DEN, Addr/Data etc.
Please can someone point me in the right direction.
I wrote some AVX instructions like :
__m256 x0 = _mm256_load_ps(f);
__m256 y0 = _mm256_load_ps(f+8);
__m256 z0 = _mm256_add_ps(x0, y0);
_mm256_store_ps( s, z0);
When I compiler this, does it matter whether I use -xAVX compiler option or not? I am using icpc 2013 on Linux