Quick Poll: Are you using Red Hat 7.1?

Quick Poll: Are you using Red Hat 7.1?

Ritratto di jeffrey-gallagher (Intel)

Hey there hi there ho there forum members,

Intel marketing is curious, and so am I -->

Are you currently using Red Hat 7.1?

---- If so, which kernel(s) and do you intend to upgrade anytime soon?

---- If not, are you using another Red Hat version instead? Advanced Server 2.1? RH 8.0???

Chime in, team: we're all ears!

cheers,

jdg

15 post / 0 new
Ultimo contenuto
Per informazioni complete sulle ottimizzazioni del compilatore, consultare l'Avviso sull'ottimizzazione
Ritratto di demianmnave

Redhat 7.3 (with "borrowed" components from 8.0)

Ritratto di kumark

What are your upgrade plans, if any? RH 8.0? AS 2.1?

---kk

Ritratto di jeffrey-gallagher (Intel)

Hey kk --> Good question.

We intend to support both, we're just trying to decide the order in which we'll do so. For now, looks like AS 2.1 will be supported quite soon, and 8.0 later.

(You're understanding the reason for this poll perfectly: if there aren't many 7.1 users out there, we can get to 8.0 sooner...)

cheers

jdg

Ritratto di demianmnave

I'll probably wait until 8.x, for some x > 1, before I upgrade.

Ritratto di jeffrey-gallagher (Intel)

Demianmnave,

Sounds like you've been burned before?

cheers

jdg

Ritratto di stev

I use RH7.3 and SuSE 8.1 as linux systems.

Ritratto di Community Admin

We're using RH 7.2 with kernels from our hardware
provider on HPC clusters.

If we're going to upgrade, it will be >= RH 8.1

Ritratto di logger

I'm using RH8.0, so I haven't gotten a look at vtune yet. What's the expected time line for that distro?

Ritratto di jeffrey-gallagher (Intel)

Great question, logger.

The fact is we're deciding that right now. Once we have the schedule nailed down and official, I'll post it here.

cheers

jdg

Ritratto di geoff.leach


We have a linux graphics lab which doubles as a cluster. We've just upgraded to RH8.0 from RH7.3. Under 7.3 I used ifc 6 and icc 6 for compiling MPICH.

I've been using ifc 7.0 on RH8.0 on my personal desktop for my Fortran 95 molecular dynamics code. Although I dont think RH8.0 is officially supported yet for ifc 7 it seems to work well for me, and a recent build seemed to have fixed the problem using the debugger. ifc 7 gave a significant performance boost (around 20-30%) over ifc 6 for my application.

There are features in RH8.0 which are a real win for me (antialiased fonts in particular). I'm hoping to compile MPICH on RH8.0 with the 7.0 compilers with the f90 stuff enabled rsn.

So my vote is for support for RH8.0 (with 8.1 supposedly RSN) for the vtune and the compilers ...

Ritratto di normclerman

We use SuSE 8.1 (and obviously are not currently using VTune, but will as soon as it's available for SuSE).

Norm

Ritratto di jeffrey-gallagher (Intel)

Hey normclerman,

You won't have too much longer to wait. The next release of VTune CLI, called version 1.1 right now, will support SuSE 8.0, 8.1, and SLES 8.0.

Stay tuned: as soon as it's downloadable, we'll be trumpeting fanfares to let you know here. (Timeframe: very late March, very early April.)

cheers

jdg

Ritratto di kumark

Norm,

Please note that the recently released VTune Performance Analyzer 7.0 already supports SuSE distros including SuSE Linux 8.0 and 8.1 with the help of its remote agents for Linux.

As Jeff noted earlier, we are in the process of releasing the native Linux support for SuSE distros in our 1.1 release for the VTune analyzer for Linux product coming soon.

Thanks,
Kumar Kandaswamy

Ritratto di Daniel Bricker (Intel)

Jeff,

In our buildings RH 7.1 is the only version officially supported by IT. That means that 100s of engineers are working with RH7.1

-Daniel

Accedere per lasciare un commento.