Hi,

FOSSology (http://www.fossology.org) reports a licence inconsistency in both tbb40_297oss and tbb41_20121003oss. For example, the doxygen documentation of aligned_space.h (http://threadingbuildingblocks.org/docs/doxygen/a00438.html) contains a proprietary licence, whereas the source file aligned_space.h contains an open source licence (other HTML files are affected as well). Is the licence information in the source code intentionally replaced for generation of documentation? The same non-OSS licence is also used in win64-tbb-export.lst, win64-tbb-export.def etc.

Kind Regards