Let's have a regular C++ array of complex:
Then, let's have an Intel ArBB dense of complex:
The naïve way of binding af to vf is:
But this will *not* work. If we look up the template definition of bind, it says the first parameter of bind must be an Intel ArBB dense container of some Intel ArBB scalar type, for example, dense<T>. Then, the second parameter of bind must be a pointer to uncaptured<T>
If T is f32, then uncaptured<T> is float.
If T is i64, then uncaptured<T> is int64_t, and so on.
But then how to you bind a series of complex values to an Intel ArBB dense complex? In many cases complex is represented as a pair of two floats.
However if T is std::complex<f32> then uncaptured<T> is NOTstd::complex<float> because in this case, both T and uncaptured<T> are of std::complex type. Another way to understand this is that there does not exist an uncaptured<T> for std::complex<f32>.
How does one do the binding then?
std::complex type is not treated as a scalar type in Intel ArBB. Therefore, the intuitive version of bind() does not work for it. We have to use two C/C++ arrays, one for the real part and the other for the imaginary part. Then, we have to pass pointers to both arrays to bind().
Here's the full solution:
typedef std::complex<f32> ArBBComplex; std::vector<float> f_real(SIZE); std::vector<float> f_imag(SIZE); // fill in some test data std::fill(f_real.begin(), f_real.end(), 1.0); std::fill(f_imag.begin(), f_imag.end(), -1.0); dense<ArBBComplex> a_f; bind(a_f, SIZE, &f_real, &f_imag);
So far, this is the best known way to achieve binding. However, our engineering team is working on improving the interface, making it more intuitive and straightforward. Please communicate with us through the user forum on any requests or suggestions to improve the binding to complex numbers.