Intel® Developer Zone:
Intel® Cilk™ Plus

Announcements
 

Discussion of the Intel® Cilk™ Plus language as implemented in the Intel® C++ Compiler in Intel® C++ Composer XE and in open source and its use in implementing parallelism in C/C++ applications.

Please do not include private information such as your email address or product serial number in your posts. If you need to share private information with an Intel employee, they can start a private thread for you.

This is a peer forum for developers using Intel® technology. Response times vary depending on the complexity of your issue.
Topic / Topic starter Post date Repliessort ascending Last Post
Normal topic Simple Array Notation failing at run-time
by Jorge Martinis
Thu, 10/20/2011 - 14:31 7
by Barry Tannenbau...
Thu, 10/20/2011 - 14:31
Normal topic (very) Bad parallel efficiency, cilkview interpretation
by Matthieu Ospici
Mon, 11/19/2012 - 00:52 7
by Barry Tannenbau...
Mon, 11/26/2012 - 09:47
Normal topic Question on the Status of Cilk Plus Support in GCC Mainline
by Yufeng Z.
Mon, 04/28/2014 - 10:30 7
by Nick M.
Fri, 04/24/2015 - 11:42
Normal topic stdarg.h files
by newport_j
Wed, 02/15/2012 - 13:28 6
by Sergey Kostrov
Fri, 02/17/2012 - 16:19
Normal topic How to cause cilk_for to use all cores ?
by Zvi Vered
Thu, 05/02/2013 - 07:18 6
by jimdempseyatthecove
Fri, 05/03/2013 - 14:10
Normal topic Infinite loop in CilkPlus gcc
by Nick M.
Fri, 07/19/2013 - 05:58 6
by Nick M.
Fri, 07/19/2013 - 13:44
Normal topic Internal compiler error
by eunoia
Tue, 02/07/2012 - 01:08 6
by patrick.marlier
Tue, 02/07/2012 - 01:08
Normal topic Try #3 - Using Intel Toolset instead of GCC
by Robert M.
Wed, 02/05/2014 - 08:08 6
by Robert M.
Sat, 02/08/2014 - 03:56
Normal topic cilk stack
by yanyh
Wed, 08/22/2012 - 09:32 6
by Barry Tannenbau...
Thu, 08/23/2012 - 08:04
Normal topic Array notation and parallelisation
by Nick M.
Wed, 10/02/2013 - 06:08 6
by Nick M.
Wed, 10/02/2013 - 09:17
Normal topic Cilk Plus Performance Help
by dsf423
Mon, 07/11/2011 - 14:22 6
by dsf423
Mon, 07/11/2011 - 14:27
Normal topic Question on reducers
by Lawrence R.
Mon, 03/31/2014 - 15:52 6
by Barry Tannenbau...
Tue, 04/01/2014 - 13:29
Normal topic Q about fibonacci example
by Victor E.
Thu, 09/17/2015 - 16:06 6
by Jim Sukha (Intel)
Fri, 09/18/2015 - 09:07
Normal topic Detecting a steal without holder (and why are hypermap lookups expensive?)
by tfk
Wed, 11/13/2013 - 14:06 6
by tfk
Thu, 11/14/2013 - 13:46
Normal topic Parallel Search With Cilk Plus
by Ömer Faruk Kalkan
Thu, 05/01/2014 - 08:08 6
by Ömer Faruk Kalkan
Sat, 05/03/2014 - 04:38
Normal topic Cannot vectorize array notations
by maeshiro_mi
Thu, 06/21/2012 - 18:58 6
by maeshiro_mi
Wed, 06/27/2012 - 18:13
Normal topic wierd behaviour of cilk_for keyword
by amandeepgautam
Tue, 07/24/2012 - 15:25 6
by jimdempseyatthecove
Thu, 08/02/2012 - 04:59
Normal topic Which repo to checkout to have GCC 4.7 and Cilk ?
by mrjay42
Thu, 02/16/2012 - 03:38 6
by Balaji Iyer (Intel)
Thu, 02/16/2012 - 03:38
Normal topic simple 'for' runs much faster than 'cilk_for'
by zvivered
Wed, 11/06/2013 - 12:52 6
by zvivered
Sun, 11/10/2013 - 10:15
Normal topic set label "Worker Count" 0.0,0.0
by newport_j
Tue, 02/07/2012 - 12:26 6
by Zitzlsberger, G...
Thu, 02/09/2012 - 02:04
Normal topic Maximum recursion depth
by chrisfeist
Wed, 05/23/2012 - 14:24 6
by Sergey Kostrov
Sat, 05/26/2012 - 09:20
Normal topic Thread-safety of writing a std::vector
by Ömer Faruk Kalkan
Wed, 08/20/2014 - 13:33 6
by Barry Tannenbau...
Mon, 09/22/2014 - 08:55
Normal topic Cilk plus Critical section and locks
by Sushek Shekar
Tue, 02/12/2013 - 10:02 6
by Sushek Shekar
Tue, 02/12/2013 - 11:29
Normal topic selinux issues
by BradleyKuszmaul
Tue, 05/10/2011 - 07:49 6
by Brandon Hewitt ...
Fri, 05/20/2011 - 18:16
Normal topic Problem of fault segmentation
by amina-jarraya
Sat, 02/11/2012 - 08:57 6
by amina-jarraya
Wed, 02/15/2012 - 04:25
New posts
No new posts
Hot topic with new posts
Hot topic without new posts
Sticky topic
Locked topic
For more complete information about compiler optimizations, see our Optimization Notice.