Likes/Dislikes of currently available Cluster Management Software Pkgs

Likes/Dislikes of currently available Cluster Management Software Pkgs

Imagen de Richard Libby (Intel)


We are interested in hearing your feedback on likes/dislikes of the clustering software management package you are using (Such as Scyld, OSCAR, NPACI Rocks, Score, etc.). Do you think that ease of installation is key, or is it worth a little bit of hassle to get installed in order to get a more robust platform?

publicaciones de 5 / 0 nuevos
Último envío
Para obtener más información sobre las optimizaciones del compilador, consulte el aviso sobre la optimización.
Imagen de Clay Breshears (Intel)


Richard -


Ease and completeness of installation are the keys as far as I'm concerned. Also, maintenance and ease of upgrade is a leading concern. If I can't install some library or other piece of support software across the nodes of the cluster with little effort, I might as well not have the management software package.


I've installed some Rocks clusters and have been impressed with the installation procedure. On OSCAR, I really appreciated the ability to run the same command on a set of cluster nodes with a single command. This allowed the setup and tear down of PVFS to be done quite easily.


For our purposes, we don't really have clusters that last for more than a few weeks, so I've not had the chance to see how well any one management software performs for an extended period of time. Thus, I really only have installation experience with these packages.


--clay


Imagen de Richard Libby (Intel)

Rocks (and derived works) also have the ability to run commands across the nodes from a single command line. For those new to the list, here is the standard syntax for both packages:


Rocks:


cluster-fork "uname -a"


Rocks also has commands such as cluster-ps and cluster-kill.


OSCAR:


cexec "uname -a"


OSCAR has one neat command called cpush that allows a file copy to each node. Of course, this command can be achieved with a detailed cexec or cluster-fork command too, but it ease of use is important.



On the subject of ease of installation, upgrade and maintenance, have you tried Scyld at all? How about some of the other ones, such as ThinOSCAR, HA-OSCAR, SSS-OSCAR, Clubmask, Warewulf, Clustermatic, SCore, OpenSCE, Mandrake CLIC, OpenMosix, and LSF?

Imagen de Henry Gabb (Intel)

Hi Rich,
I'm sure the cluster management tools supplied in OSCAR and Rocks can do the same things but I prefer the Cluster Command and Control (C3) package used in OSCAR, mainly because it's better documented. Do you know where I can find documentation for the cluster-* commands used in Rocks?

Thanks,
Henry

Imagen de Henry Gabb (Intel)


Hi Clay,
If you think it's easy to install and configure PVFS on an OSCAR cluster, try it on a Rocks cluster. Nearly all the steps of PVFS installation and configuration are done automatically. Rockscanbring up your compute nodes asPVFS I/O servers or clients. When the cluster installation is finished, all you have to do is turn on the PVFS metadata server and mount the PVFS filesystem.

Henry

Inicie sesión para dejar un comentario.