forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred

forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred

Imagen de Henry X.


I have been using MKL non-symmetric solver for my finite element code (up to MKL Version10), but have a probelm with updated version of MKL when  call  pardiso_unsym  ( reordering):

      phase = 11 ! only reordering and symbolic factorization
      CALL pardiso (pt, maxfct, mnum, mtype, phase, n, a, ia, ja,
     1 idum, nrhs, iparm, msglvl, ddum, ddum, error)


forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
Image              PC                Routine            Line        Source    00002AAAAC8B754B  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown

Stack trace terminated abnormally.


The compiler link I used are:

Currently Loaded Modulefiles:
  1) Barrine/2.0                     2) mpt/2.00                        3) intel-cmkl-11/   4) intel-fc-11/

COM = ifort -m64  -w -fpp -I/sw/sdev/intel/ComposerXE/composer_xe_2011_sp1.8.273/mkl/include

LIBS =  -L"/sw/sdev/intel/ComposerXE/composer_xe_2011_sp1.8.273/mkl/lib/intel64" -lmkl_intel_lp64 \
        -lmkl_intel_thread \
        -lmkl_core \
        -liomp5 -lpthread -lm

 In addtion, my code works well with the SuperLU, but not with MKL Pardiso at the moment. Any advices to fix it? Thanks in advance

publicaciones de 7 / 0 nuevos
Último envío
Para obtener más información sobre las optimizaciones del compilador, consulte el aviso sobre la optimización.
Imagen de Alexander Kalinkin (Intel)

Hi Henry,

Could you provide testcase or matrix elements with iparm array to reproduce issue on our side? It could help us to investigate it

With best regards,

Alexander Kalinkin

Imagen de Tim Prince

Did you follow a checklist such as

to track this down?  No doubt, you're aware that the most common situation is a requirement to increase stack limit or try heap-arrays option.

Imagen de Henry X.


Thanks Alexander and Tim.

I had a probelm to post it here and thus I emailed you directly this Monday. I used to check the code up to item 5) as listed by Tim.

My probelm is not solved yet and thus I attached the matrix element and solver code (iparm) below. Look forward to your further advice.




Imagen de Alexander Kalinkin (Intel)


I've turn on matrix checker on your matrix (iparm(27)=1) and got next problem:

*** Error in PARDISO (incorrect input matrix ) error_num= 24
*** Input check: j=4908159, ja(j)=35835, ja(j+1)=35830 are incompatible
The following ERROR was detected: -1

Looks like your ja array is incorrect.

With best regards,

Alexander Kalinkin

Imagen de Gennady Fedorov (Intel)

did you check the input consistency with matrix checker option? iparm(27) =1

Imagen de Henry X.

Thanks. My probelm is solved after reordering JA.

Inicie sesión para dejar un comentario.