Dear Steve et al. at Intel,
Can you please review the code shown below and check whether it is ok to have a superfluous GENERIC OPERATOR specification in an extended derived type that is simply a copy of one in the abstract parent? See lines 17 and 47 in the code snippet, a heavily simplified version of my actual type.
This code compiles without any errors or warnings in Intel Fortran XE 2013, Update 1 even if standards checking is turned on.
However, gfortran 4.9 flags an error saying the two procedures for the + operator are ambiguous.